Boralex’s obviously ungrounded claim led to our defeat before the first court (ongoing appeal). This procedure has interrupted our flourishing development, but above all it prevented us from carrying out our IPO project, which would have allowed us to raise €250 million to fight global warming.
Bringing a claim is a right which the Court of Cassation punishes if the claimant brought a frivolous lawsuit or resorted to fraud. Many mathematicians, including a Fields Medal, have confirmed that the reading of the price formula of the development contract by Boralex was of a rare stupidity and revealed the « collapse of the level of education ». Explication calcul Legal nonsense is as serious and obvious as mathematical nonsence in Boralex’s « reasoning ».
That’s why InnoVent and Grégoire Verhaeghe sue Boralex and its so-called expert Finexsi for damages caused by the interruption of its development and the torpedoing of its IPO. Assignation
As Boralex acknowledges that InnoVent is worth one billion euros and as an IPO covers at least 25% of the capital, we claim €250 million from Boralex and its accomplice Finexsi.
The president of the Paris commercial court has recognized the seriousness of our request judging : “[InnoVent] already has sufficient evidence for a trial to prove the facts it claims” !
We asked the magistrate to authorize us to examine the Boralex’s and Finexsi’s computers to obtain additional evidence of their responsibility. However, our argument is so obviously well-grounded that the court ruled our request superfluous!
In line with our commitment to transparency, here are the documents that led the president of the commercial court to find that we didn’t even need additional parts to demonstrate the Boralex’s and Finexsi’s frivolous lawsuit (or worse).
Finally, we filed a complaint against Boralex and Finexsi for drafting and use in court of a false statement intended to establish the alleged gain missed by Boralex. Plainte contre Boralex et Finexsi_23 11 2021